Functional training remains one of the most debated concepts in fitness, often causing confusion among professionals and enthusiasts alike. Let's clarify what it really means and whether it offers unique benefits compared to traditional training methods.

What Makes Training "Functional"?

Traditional views suggest training becomes more functional when it:

• Moves from general to specific movements
• Transitions from seated to standing exercises
• Incorporates multiple movement planes
• Progresses from slow to fast movements
• Shifts from bilateral to unilateral exercises

However, this oversimplified view doesn't always align with individual needs. For example, a controlled leg press might better serve an elderly person than an explosive single-leg squat.

The New Expert Definition

A recent international panel of researchers defined functional training as: "A physical interventional approach that contributes to the enhancement of human performance, according to individual goals, in sports, daily life, rehabilitation, or fitness, and takes into consideration the specificity of the task and the unique responsiveness of each individual."

Key findings from recent research:

• No universal definition exists
• Benefits match those of traditional training
• Uses similar exercises as conventional training
• Exercise functionality depends on individual goals

The Case Against "Functional Training"

A 2022 review suggests abandoning the term altogether because:

• Traditional training provides equal benefits
• No clear distinction exists between functional and conventional exercises
• The term creates unnecessary confusion

Bottom Line

All effective training is inherently functional when it:

• Aligns with specific goals
• Considers individual needs
• Creates measurable adaptations

Whether labeled "functional" or not, successful training programs focus on individual objectives and proper progression, rather than adhering to arbitrary classifications.

Related Articles

Previous Articles